Sunday, 7 December 2025

AI in academia: Tool of future or threat to integrity?

Facebook
X
WhatsApp
Telegram
Email
Datuk Dr John Lau Pang Heng

LET’S READ SUARA SARAWAK/ NEW SARAWAK TRIBUNE E-PAPER FOR FREE AS ​​EARLY AS 2 AM EVERY DAY. CLICK LINK

IN the halls of modern education, artificial intelligence (AI) has entered like a bold new student – eager, promising, but not without controversy. Once confined to science fiction and tech labs, AI is now becoming an integral part of the academic world. From automated grading systems and intelligent tutoring to AI-generated research drafts and plagiarism detection, the impact is impossible to ignore. Yet, with opportunity comes caution.

Is AI a revolutionary tool for academic progress, or is it a risk to the very foundation of learning and intellectual integrity?

The Rise of AI in Classrooms and Lecture Halls

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a futuristic concept – it’s already at work in our classrooms. According to a 2023 report by HolonIQ, the global market for AI in education is projected to reach $25.7 billion by 2028, reflecting a rapid adoption rate in universities and learning institutions worldwide. Another survey by Educause Review found that 61 per cent of higher education institutions in the U.S. were already implementing some form of AI in teaching or administration.

One of the most popular uses? Personalised learning. AI-powered platforms like Squirrel AI (China) or Carnegie Learning (USA) analyse a student’s strengths and weaknesses and adapt content in real time. In a study conducted by McKinsey & Company, personalised learning systems improved student outcomes by up to 30 per cent, especially in STEM fields.

Similarly, educators benefit from automated grading systems, capable of assessing not only multiple-choice tests but also short essays and coding exercises. These tools significantly reduce the time spent on administrative work, allowing lecturers to focus more on mentorship and curriculum development.

Research Support and Academic Writing

For researchers, AI is becoming a quiet partner in the background. Tools like Semantic Scholar, Scite, and ChatGPT assist with literature reviews, generate summaries, and even suggest research gaps based on trends in academic publishing. AI’s ability to process massive data sets at high speed has enabled new discoveries, particularly in the fields of medicine, economics and environmental science.

Academic writing has also been revolutionised. Programs like Grammarly, Quillbot, and AI writing assistants help non-native English speakers improve their grammar and clarity. In many cases, they level the playing field, offering global accessibility to academic participation.

A Global Perspective: How Countries Are Responding

Around the world, educational institutions are responding to the AI revolution in different ways – some with caution, others with open arms.

In Singapore, the Ministry of Education has introduced AI literacy modules for secondary and tertiary students, focusing on both technical skills and ethical decision-making. Students are taught how AI works, its limitations, and how to use it responsibly. This proactive approach reflects a broader national strategy to become an AI-driven economy without compromising educational values.

In Finland, universities have begun experimenting with AI tutors that complement traditional teaching. These virtual assistants answer student queries, offer additional resources, and track learning progress, allowing professors to better support those who struggle silently.

Conversely, in the UK and parts of the US, several universities temporarily banned AI tools like ChatGPT until clearer policies could be developed. While well-intentioned, outright bans raise questions about enforceability and fairness. After all, in the digital age, students are digital natives. Denying them access without equipping them with ethical understanding may only widen the gap between education and real-world application.

Can AI Close the Educational Divide?

One of the most promising aspects of AI is its ability to bridge gaps in global education. In remote or underfunded areas, where qualified teachers and resources are limited, AI-powered apps can provide access to high-quality learning materials. For example, in parts of sub-Saharan Africa, AI-based platforms like M-Shule are used to deliver curriculum content through SMS, enabling students in low-bandwidth areas to keep up with national education standards.

Furthermore, AI tools can provide real-time translations and explanations, making global education more inclusive. Students from non-English-speaking countries can now participate in international online courses with the help of AI translators and writing aids.

But for this potential to be realised equitably, governments and institutions must invest in infrastructure, teacher training, and inclusive digital policies. Otherwise, AI risks becoming yet another driver of inequality – empowering the privileged while leaving others behind.

The Role of Educators in an AI-Driven Classroom

So where does this leave teachers? Are they being replaced?

The answer is a firm no. In fact, educators are more crucial than ever.

While AI can automate tasks and deliver content, it cannot replace the empathy, mentorship and critical dialogue that form the heart of meaningful education. AI cannot inspire a love for literature, guide moral reasoning, or understand the emotional context behind a student’s struggle. These are deeply human interactions that require trust, connection and care.

Thus, the educator’s role is evolving – from knowledge transmitter to learning facilitator and ethical guide.

Teachers now have the responsibility not only to deliver content but to help students navigate the digital landscape, interpret AI-generated material, and question what is authentic, biased, or incomplete.

Moving Toward an Ethical AI-Academic Framework

To move forward constructively, educational institutions need a clear and inclusive framework for AI integration. This includes:

Transparency and Disclosure: Students must declare when and how they use AI tools in assignments or research.

Context-Sensitive Use: Policies should distinguish between acceptable AI uses (e.g., grammar correction, research support) and misuse (e.g., full essay generation).

AI Literacy Education: Just like computer literacy in the early 2000s, AI literacy must be integrated into the curriculum.

Inclusive Access: Ensure all students, regardless of background, have access to AI tools and know how to use them effectively.

Continuous Policy Review: AI is evolving rapidly. Policies must be flexible and regularly updated in consultation with students, educators and AI experts.

Final Reflections: A Call for Balance

In this complex landscape, the key is not to resist AI – but to rethink education alongside it.

Let us not make the mistake of treating AI as a shortcut or a cheat code. Let us also not be so rigid as to reject the very innovations that could expand our reach, deepen understanding, and free up human potential for what matters most – thinking, feeling, creating and connecting.

Education has always evolved. From chalkboards to smartboards, from handwritten essays to typed documents, and now from search engines to intelligent writing assistants. AI is simply the next phase in this journey.

The real question is not “Should we use AI in academia?” – but “How can we use it wisely?”

As with any powerful tool, the answer lies not in fear, but in responsibility.

The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of Sarawak Tribune. The writer can be reached at drjohnlau@gmail.com.

Related News

Most Viewed Last 2 Days