I take issue with the statement made by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, which was published yesterday on several national news portals.
The former premier alluded to Sarawak’s push for oil and gas control as harmful to the nation. He also alleged that Sarawak was “very poor” under British rule, implying that our wealth came only after becoming part of Malaysia.
“When Sarawak was under British rule, did they build the Twin Towers? They were impoverished. The British took all their money,” he was quoted as saying.
Dr Mahathir, who is set to turn a centenarian this year, did acknowledge in some way that we were the ones who built the Twin Towers.
This sentiment has resonated in Sarawak over the years. While visiting the nation’s capital and viewing the iconic towers, a mix of feelings has always been present. There is pride in witnessing Malaysia’s progress in erecting the Twin Towers, yet also a sense of envy as to why Sarawak did not experience the same level of development as Malaya.
It is crucial to note that Malaysia has gained more economically from its association with Sarawak compared to Sarawak’s benefits from forming the federation.
Why do I say this? Look at the development gap between Sarawak and Malaya. Sabah faces similar challenges.
If we had truly benefited economically and financially, there would be no significant development gap between the regions. However, this is not the case.
Perhaps this is typical of Dr Mahathir – the longest-serving Prime Minister in Malaysia’s history, with a 22-year tenure followed by a 22-month second stint.
What may have caused disquiet among Sarawakians is Dr Mahathir’s failure to apologise or acknowledge the unfair treatment of Sarawak during his time in power.
He continues to provoke Sarawakians by suggesting that even if Sarawak gains control of its oil and gas resources, prosperity is not guaranteed.
This lack of confidence in Sarawakians’ ability to manage resources for the public good is regrettable, especially considering the successful stewardship of Premier Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Abang Johari Tun Openg.
Under his leadership, revenue re-engineering methods and alternative sources of income have significantly contributed to Sarawak’s development in infrastructure, economy, and social well-being.
This success should be recognised. Sarawakians have demonstrated commendable leadership, financial prudence, and a long-term vision.
It is unfortunate that Dr Mahathir’s view suggests that Sarawakians are incapable of managing their own oil and gas resources.
I am confident that Sarawak, under our Premier’s leadership, can navigate the ongoing dispute over oil and gas control and reach a solution that benefits both Sarawak and Malaysia.
As reiterated by Sarawak leaders and analysts, a win-win solution is the goal. However, it is crucial to find a resolution that upholds Sarawak’s rights and ownership of its resources.
Sarawak should not succumb to pressure or accept the narrative that it is harming the nation. It is time to secure what rightfully belongs to us for our future and the well-being of all Sarawakians.
The views expressed here are those of the writer and do not necessarily represent the views of Sarawak Tribune. The writer can be reached at nazmixsuhaimi@gmail.com.
